Unreasonable to order possession

Please follow the steps below for more information relating to the defence of ‘unreasonableness’

Ground 8

Unreasonableness

What does the Ground Say?

lottie integration

Ground 8 – Explanation

This ground allows a landlord to seek possession of a decant property (temporary accommodation provided to a tenant while their principal accommodation undergoes repairs or redevelopment) once the works on the principal accommodation have been completed. The landlord can reclaim possession of the temporary decant property in order to return the tenant to their principal home.


The landlord can issue a claim for possession under this Ground if: 

a) the tenant was a secure tenant of the principal dwelling-house at the time when he ceased to occupy it as his home and moved to the temporary home

and

b) the tenant was relocated to a temporary form of accommodation while the property in the principal accommodation under the tenancy was undergoing works and the tenant was aware of such accommodation being only temporary while the repair works were being completed in the principal accommodation

and

b) the works have been completed in the principal accommodation



Note: Possession claims under this ground is for possession of the temporary accommodation which was provided while the principal accommodation was undergoing works, the principal accommodation remains unaffected at this point.


Discretionary Ground – Has to be reasonable to grant possession
As this is a discretionary ground, even if it is proved that there is some rent due, the court must still decide whether it is reasonable to grant possession.

Potential factors which the court might consider when determining whether it would be reasonable to grant possession even if the Ground is proved by the landlord

DISCLAIMER: Below are some examples of factors commonly raised at Court, however, this factors below are just some example, and are non-exhaustive. The Court may consider a wide and unlimited variety of factors.

How It Works

Unreasonableness

Common Factor relating to Reasonableness (1)

1- What does this mean?

Explanation

I
The tenant may argue that, although the works are technically completed, the work did not achieve the intended remedial objectives and that the principal accommodation is still unsuitable or unsafe for occupation. For instance, the property might have issues that make it uninhabitable, such as damp, inadequate heating, or poor access.

2- Evidence

Evidence Required

a) Evidence of the issues that were existing in the principal accommodation which made it unsuitable and which rendered the commencement of works necessary.

b) Evidence of the severity, degree, magnitude and consequences or effects of the issues which existed at the property.

c) Evidence, that although the works are technically completed, the works did not achieve the objective of providing a complete remedy to the issues in the principal accommodation which made it unsuitable. Thus, the property remains unsuitable to move back to


b) Proof of the positive effects of rehabilitative courses, experiences or training.

c) Proof that the individual convicted of the indictable offence taking place at the scene of a riot, following their attendance of rehabilitative training experiences, now demonstrates good conduct.

3 – Advancing Defence

Outline in Defence Form
or at Court

If the time limit for filing the defence has not passed, you need to clearly outline this defence, obtain the necessary evidence, attach the evidence and refer to the attached evidence in the defence form when you are explaining your dispute.

If the time limit for filing the defence has passed, then you need prepare. a written draft of your reasons for the dispute, obtain the necessary evidence and bring it to court and be prepared to advance all such information to the Court Duty adviser, to the opposition, and to the Judge..
FAQ
Find Your Question Here

Potential Orders the Court Can Make in response to a submission of unreasonableness

The Court can make a number of orders following a possession hearing, below are some of the most common orders the Court can make in this regard

1 – Adjournment Generally, with liberty to restore

Adjournment generally with liberty to restore means that the court will halt the proceedings for now, without making a final determination regarding the claim. After, the court has halted the proceedings without making any final orders, it would be for the Claimant to apply to the court in order to restore the proceedings for a final determination.

2 – Adjournment on Terms

Adjournment on terms means that the court will halt the proceedings on the basis of terms agreed between the parties. For example, it could be agreed the court will halt the proceedings on the basis that the tenant pay back £100 every month towards his arrears for 8 months, until he pays back the £800 in arrears. In this case, as long as the tenant complies with the order, the proceedings will be put on hold. However, if the tenant fails to comply with the terms of the agreement i.e fails to pay £100 on the second month of the agreement, then the Claimant would be entitled to restore the proceedings and request another hearing where the Court could consider making a final determination.

3 – Suspended Possession Order

A Suspended Possession order means that the court will order possession but suspend the Claimant’s abilitiy to enforce the possession on the basis that the tenant agrees to comply with the terms of the suspenstion i.e. suspend the possession enforcement on the basis of terms agreed between the parties. For example, it could be agreed the court suspended the ability for the Claimant to commence possession enforcement on the basis that the tenant pay back £500 every month towards his arrears for 4 months, until he pays back the £2000 in arrears. In this case, as long as the tenant complies with the order, the Claimant will not be entitled to enforce possession agains tthe Claimant. However, if the tenant fails to comply with the terms of the agreement i.e fails to pay £500 on the second month of the agreement, then the Claimant would be entitled to make an application to the court (request from the court) to grant the Claimant a ‘Warrant’ for Eviction which could be used to enforce possession against the tenant.

4 – Dismissal of the Possession Claim (Finding in favour of the tenant)

This dismissal of the possession Claim means that the Court does not agree its reasonable to order possession against the Defendant, and the Court does not consider it necessary to place the tenant under terms with the potential of returning back to the court aa sanction which is impending should he fail to comply with any terms. It is the final determination of the matter in favour of the Defendant. Should the Claimant wish to make another claim for possession they will to restart the entire possession proceedings from the start i.e. sending a notice for possession, then issue a claim for possession, and so forth.

5 – Granting Possession to the Claimant (The Local Authority ) – Finding in favour of the Landlord

This granting of possession to the Claimant (The Landlord) means that the Court finds that the Landlord has proved the Grounds for Possession under which they have made the Claim. Also, that the Court finds it reasonable to grant possession i.e. the court considers that there are no circumstances present which would make it unreasonable for the court to grant the Claimant Possession. The Granting of possession is a final determination, which is only subject to judicial appeal if certain requirements are met in order to achieve an appeal hearing. Alternatively, once the Landlord is granted the possession, the Tenant may have one final avenue, which is to suspend the warrant of eviction when and if the Landlord decides to apply tot he court for a warrant to evict you subsequent to being granted the possession order by the court.